> it wouldn't be a free speech issue It really hinges on what you mean by the phrase "free speech" when there is no clear context. It is true that in the cont

> it wouldn't be a free speech issue It really hinges on what you mean by the phrase "free speech" when there is no clear context. It is true that in the context of US lawmaking, the free speech rights specified in the 1st Amendment are in play. But there is the concept of free speech outside that context also. For example the editors of a newspaper being inclusive of viewpoints in the "Letters to the Editor" section or a radio show being inclusive of viewpoints from callers or a website operator being inclusive of viewpoints in public comment sections. I think there is value in advocating for inclusiveness in those (and other) contexts and labeling that idea "free speech" but I don't think it has to be "absolutely no moderation or restrictions". There is room for an editorial policy in those places and there is room to criticize any particular policy that some entity might put in place as not being supportive of "free speech" even when there is no 1st Amendment context in play.