It's not. Contrarian takes on the internet are 90% trolling and 9% clueless/bad faith arguments being presented as if they had the same weight of evidence behin

It's not. Contrarian takes on the internet are 90% trolling and 9% clueless/bad faith arguments being presented as if they had the same weight of evidence behind them as the (usually) established view. The 1% of actually contrarian arguments are usually well received, even if they differ significantly from the status quo or say something outside the Overton window.