4 ms·
I looked it up and found this interesting read: https://jshint.com/relicensing-2020/ https://jshint.com/relicensing-2020/
by msdrigg 4y ago
I looked it up and found this interesting read: https://jshint.com/relicensing-2020/ https://jshint.com/relicensing-2020/
- gabagool 4y agoI read this and it is interesting. I get why asking JS Hint contributors to re-submit/approve their changes is clear of the Do No Evil clause. But, I don't understand why all changes before that (from JS Lint Day 1 until it was forked into JS Hint) aren't subject to that same clause. Why is the Eclipse Foundation not subject to it?
- azornathogron 4y agoThe Eclipse Foundation received their copy of JSLint under the MIT Expat license, not the default no-evil license. > Meanwhile, the author of JSLint permitted the Eclipse Foundation to relicense a version of JSLint using the MIT Expat license so that it could be included in their project named Orion