A good analogy is a human and blood. Our bodies naturally regenerate blood If the earth does not regenerate oil on human timescales, then your example is not a

A good analogy is a human and blood. Our bodies naturally regenerate blood If the earth does not regenerate oil on human timescales, then your example is not a good analogy. http://www.google.com/search?q=%22does+not+regenerate+oil%22 http://www.google.com/search?q=%22does+not+regenerate+oil%22 As far as we know, the earth does not regenerate oil. The only question is, how much is really left? If, as has been established and has so-far been contested in this thread neither by you nor by anyone else, there remains at least 70,000-years-worth of oil (at today's comsumption rates) in the earth's crust, and if demand is not growing at an appreciable rate, then civilization is not in imminent danger of experiencing an oil crash. Do you believe that civilization is in imminent danger of experiencing an oil crash?