4 ms·
Edit: Sorry Sandersd, I did not carefefully read what you said "it's what people like us want them to want." - which is even more interesting! I would go one s
by nonrandomstring 5y ago
Edit: Sorry Sandersd, I did not carefefully read what you said "it's
what people like us want them to want." - which is even more
interesting!
I would go one stage more "meta" and say; No. Actually one of the
deep, deep problems in computer science and digital technology is the
very idea that "we know what people want". Or that they know
themselves. There is so much said in this forum and other software
communities about "what people really want". Outside of quite narrow
UX psychology - which deals mainly with how people prefer to complete
tasks within paradigms that have already been selected for them - I
know of little or no evidence based research on the lifestyle and
societal choices around technology. That is why I frequently use the
phrase *foisted upon" in Digital Vegan [1][2], to indicate the
extraordinary errors of sentiment attribution that occur around tech.
[1] https://digitalvegan.net https://digitalvegan.net
[2] 'Foisted' is not the same as 'forced', but nontheless there is a
'great lie' that we tell ourselves about how markets of demand and
supply work in realtion to technology.
- sanderjd 5y agoI agree with this somewhat. But I also think in the face of unknowable true desires, that the preferences revealed by what does and doesn't get used by more people should be taken seriously and at face value. I saw "web 1.0" versions in the early to mid 2000s of pretty much every product that became big in the late 2000s and 2010s. People made their choice.