Wouldn't the very situation of a platform like Twitter censoring or moderating the speech on the platform represent a kind of middle-ground? It's a private com

Wouldn't the very situation of a platform like Twitter censoring or moderating the speech on the platform represent a kind of middle-ground? It's a private company, and one can start another one that caters to a different crowd (see Parler or w/e). The government is in no position to stop that, and nobody in this thread is arguing they be given such power. As far as truly public spaces go, the law still allows all speech. Government can't stop someone from voicing their opinion at a public meeting based on content, etc. Even if it's Covid misinformation or something.