> Commentary from abroad should never be regarded as a threat to sovereignty in a mature democracy Unless it is from the US or europe that uses "human rights"

> Commentary from abroad should never be regarded as a threat to sovereignty in a mature democracy Unless it is from the US or europe that uses "human rights" as justification for war and toppling governments. You'll notice every country we want to attack ( india, china, russia, venezuela, cuba, iran, myanmar, libya, syria, etc ), we've always bring up "human rights". > India has the right to comment on the US regardless of whether the South Block thinks that there has been some provocation previously, and vice versa. Sure, but india is too weak to be a threat to the US. Their accusations of human rights violations are merely an annoyance. But when the US accuses india of human rights, india knows there will be US funded attacks, riots, sanctions, etc to destabilize and overthrow the indian government. India is just lashing out in anticipation of pressure from the US. Of course we don't care about human rights. Never have and never will. Otherwise, we'd be liberating the aborigines in australia or maori in new zealand or the inuits in alaska who are currently undergoing actual genocide. The only question is how badly we are going to punish india to get them to obey our orders concerning russia. We are putting a lot of pressure on china and india to abandon russia. Which one will be the first to crack? Only time will tell.