3 ms·
The reason I react (no pun intended haha) this way is because I have seen with my own eyes blue chip (US -- is that the right expression for "company name known
by louissan 5y ago
The reason I react (no pun intended haha) this way is because I have seen with my own eyes blue chip (US -- is that the right expression for "company name known quite literally the world over"?) companies doing exactly these sort of things.
I have seen the plastering of webpacked-gulpified-obfuscated-minified-hoistpropified-younamedifiedit mind-blowing amounts of Javascript to create the latest "cool" app.
I have seen web pages best described as "this webpage is so heavy not even light can escape it". The (not full) cast, not in order of appearance:
. 5MB+ of Javascript (not kidding) -- _after_ the above
. gazillions of HTTP requests
. internal data bled through to the outside world (not always problematic from a security point of view, but one may as well: 1) save on the bytes 2) not give malicious ideas to you-know-who)
. code coverage is inversely proportional: with grand score hovering around 3-5%.....
End result:
. from inside: a bloated over-engineered chaos (see entry: "Big Ball of Mud")
. from outside: catastrophic load times of around 35 seconds w/o a primed cache.
Talk about the latest shiny new "single page application".....
Granted, it's not always like that! :)