> The notion that all speech should be allowed actually seems stupid to me on its face, the more that I consider it. Who will decide which speech will be forbi

> The notion that all speech should be allowed actually seems stupid to me on its face, the more that I consider it. Who will decide which speech will be forbidden, and on what basis will the decision be made? How accountable will this person or body be, and to whom? Will it work transparently or in secret? How will it enforce its decisions? Who will be bound by them? What punishment will be appropriate for those who utter forbidden words? The praciticalities of censorship-enforcement are as nightmarish as the "ethical" arguments for it.