4 ms·
Well you should have nationalized it while you could've BTW why is this called hostile?
by jdrc 4y ago
Well you should have nationalized it while you could've
BTW why is this called hostile?
- refurb 4y agoNothing better than the CIA having a say on what tweets are allowed.
- neonnoodle 4y agoStandard terminology for when an acquisition is pitched directly to the shareholders against the wishes (or irrespective of the wishes) of the board.
- k8sToGo 4y agoWho is you?
- jdrc 4y agoamericans. we had a discussion about that a few days ago
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- xxs 4y agoNon-hostile version of a takeover requires a board approval at least. Depending on the jurisdiction and the company bylaws certain amount of the shareholders (say 75%+) has to vote for the takeover to actually happen. Edit: Under normal circumstance, single entities cannot 'easily' obtain a large share of the stocks even if they actively buy.