3 ms·
Locally could be easier to rely on background run of a docker image instead of another console serving the files, just to run and forget, just use it by the dep
by nilsandrey 4y ago
Locally could be easier to rely on background run of a docker image instead of another console serving the files, just to run and forget, just use it by the dependent project you probably could be working on (Dependent on the static content). I'm agreed on the cloud it's better use the plethora of services available for static content directly like Cloudflare.
- mro_name 4y ago> plethora of services available for static content when I think of static content, I think of buying a domain name + shared hosting for monthly EUR 2,-. And not assigning rights nor control but having a legal claim on both service and name. Am I missing something?