3 ms·
> NIMBYs really are selfish and shallow people My parents bought a house in an almost-rural region of southern California in 1991. It was difficult to lose the
by TimTheTinker 5y ago
> NIMBYs really are selfish and shallow people
My parents bought a house in an almost-rural region of southern California in 1991. It was difficult to lose the beautiful field across the street when a housing development went in, but they shrugged their shoulders and moved on -- no biggie.
But more recently, the tiny empty lot next to theirs has been sold and 3 really ugly apartments just went in that are totally out of character with the rest of the neighborhood. If they could have blocked this from happening, they would have -- and I don't think that's selfish NIMBYism. Your next-door neighbors' behavior affects your life profoundly, and when they do dumb stuff like building ugly, stuffed-in apartments that don't fit in with the houses next door, it will affect you negatively.
All to say, NIMBYism gets a bad rap, but having a basic standard of caring about the quality of one's neighborhood (especially next-door lots) isn't selfish or shallow.
By extension, you'd have to say it's "selfish and shallow" to pay more to not live in a bad part of town... is it really?
- TimTheTinker 5y agoTo those who disagree, would it be right to just let every developer's plan go through without review? I'm not saying "no development", I'm promoting the equivalent of code reviews on PRs before merge. Housing developers shouldn't have free reign to maximize their profits regardless of costs to a city.