4 ms·
This might qualify as high treason, as defined in the Constitution rather as used as an insult. The U.S. and North Korea are still technically at war, and this
by adfhdfhdryheryh 4y ago
This might qualify as high treason, as defined in the Constitution rather as used as an insult. The U.S. and North Korea are still technically at war, and this act was definitely aiding the North Korean government.
- SllX 4y agoI’m not sure we really are. The perpetual warfare in the absence of a treaty doesn’t really seem to hold water in a world where South Korea has opened factories in North Korea or the PRC and ROC openly trade. That said, even if it does qualify, that doesn’t seem to be the charge pursued by the Prosecutors so moot.