> It's one thing to be against crypto, but refusing it when you are a charity for the most asinine moral purity tests is absurd. How can you write that when yo

> It's one thing to be against crypto, but refusing it when you are a charity for the most asinine moral purity tests is absurd. How can you write that when you just called crypto a "scam, a ponzi scheme or a platform for pump and dumps?" If your characterization is in earnest then any charity would reflexively avoid such a thing. (Possibly excepting Sci-hub who cannot receive donations any other way-- at least that's the only positive edge case I can think of that warrants the "for the most part" hedge) Edit: clarification