3 ms·

I don’t think people are jaded. I just think it’s going to take a while for these types of generated images to pass the Turing test, and that’s why it doesn’t f

I don’t think people are jaded. I just think it’s going to take a while for these types of generated images to pass the Turing test, and that’s why it doesn’t feel that impressive yet. It’s very clear they’re made by an AI. Which isn’t bad. It’s just obvious in a way that isn’t fooling anyone. There’s a very specific way that AI generates things like hands, other limbs, eyes, facial features etc. Whoever figures out how to fix that, and then fix the “fractal” like style that’s a hallmark of AI generated images will win the AI race. Maybe it’ll be openai. Maybe it’ll be someone else.

jandrese 5y ago
You could upload these to DeviantArt and nobody would notice.
- Wojakmeme 5y ago
  This. Sure if you see 10 of them in a row you notice it. But if you choose the best looking one I bet no one will notice.
deleted 5y ago
[deleted]
grumbel 5y ago
The images already look better than what like 99.9% of humans would be able to produce and it produces them orders of magnitudes faster than what any human could ever hope to produce, even when equipped with Photoshop, 3d software and Google image search. The only real problem with them is that they are conceptually simple. It's always just a subject in the center, a setting and some modifiers. It's doesn't produce complex Renaissance paintings with dozens of characters or a graphic novel telling a story. But that seems more an issue of the short text descriptions it gets, than a fundamental limit in the AI. As for the AI-typical image artifacts, I don't see that as an issue. Think of it like upscaling an image. If you upscale it too much, you'll see the pixels. In this case you see the AI struggling to produce the necessary level of detail. Scale the image down a bit an all the artifacts go away. It's really no different then taking a real painting done by a human and getting close enough to see the brush strokes. The illusion will fall apart just the same.

jandrese 5y ago

You could upload these to DeviantArt and nobody would notice.

Wojakmeme 5y ago
This. Sure if you see 10 of them in a row you notice it. But if you choose the best looking one I bet no one will notice.

deleted 5y ago

[deleted]

grumbel 5y ago

The images already look better than what like 99.9% of humans would be able to produce and it produces them orders of magnitudes faster than what any human could ever hope to produce, even when equipped with Photoshop, 3d software and Google image search. The only real problem with them is that they are conceptually simple. It's always just a subject in the center, a setting and some modifiers. It's doesn't produce complex Renaissance paintings with dozens of characters or a graphic novel telling a story. But that seems more an issue of the short text descriptions it gets, than a fundamental limit in the AI. As for the AI-typical image artifacts, I don't see that as an issue. Think of it like upscaling an image. If you upscale it too much, you'll see the pixels. In this case you see the AI struggling to produce the necessary level of detail. Scale the image down a bit an all the artifacts go away. It's really no different then taking a real painting done by a human and getting close enough to see the brush strokes. The illusion will fall apart just the same.