Perhaps "casual" is the wrong word since it does have a pejorative implication. Put more neutrally, what I find fascinating is the asymmetry b/w the weight of p

Perhaps "casual" is the wrong word since it does have a pejorative implication. Put more neutrally, what I find fascinating is the asymmetry b/w the weight of process applied compared to impact. I am sure the individuals concerned thought very hard about it (I could not find the discussion on the mailing list, but from what I can see it may have been kept off the public list due to the security aspect).