5 ms·
Maybe private ownership of endangered species should be legalised to encourage breeding? They even admit in the article it just fuels the illicit trade, why no
by sn00tz00t 5y ago
Maybe private ownership of endangered species should be legalised to encourage breeding?
They even admit in the article it just fuels the illicit trade, why not make it legal and try to push it in a positive direction?
- grapeskin 5y agoThe problem is people with zero experience involving raising endangered life will pay loads of money just to say they have something rare in their possession, and people will gladly harvest those things just for money. Endangered plants are an obvious example. They often take decades or centuries to regrow, and locals will happily dig them up to sell for a few bucks now in exchange for destroying their future. Governments usually grant special permission to zoos and people with expertise to research how to properly breed animals, and that seems to generally work out better than just throwing them at anyone with some cash who just saw a cute animal on youtube.
- acceptably_slow 5y agoGreat idea, until it's your enterprising neighbour trying to breed black rhinos in their back yard.
- pvaldes 5y agoAs long as it has enough space and resources, that would be a fantastic idea in fact.
- Nursie 5y agoBecause the animals will die in transit, or die off under the 'care' of their new owners, either through incompetence or purely because nobody understands how to keep them alive in any form of captivity in the first place. And the people in the local area will facilitate their local extinction in their natural habitat, because of money. Which (given the first point) is likely to accelerate their total extinction. And if any of those species do survive after such commercial relocation, they may well escape and become invasive feral species in their new home. Basically, commercial incentives to fuck with nature are a bad idea. What we could really do with are commercial incentives to leave it the hell alone.
- 6LLvveMx2koXfwn 5y ago> Basically, commercial incentives to fuck with nature are a bad idea. Is there a market orientated economic system which prevents this? Our current bind seems to illustrate that despite being a 'bad idea' this is the model under which we live i.e. one which commercially incentives fucking with nature.
- EdwardDiego 5y agoFirstly, a lot of endangered species are a bit particular about how and when they breed. Secondly, breeding an endangered species with a limited gene pool requires very careful management to minimise inbreeding depression. How would you co-ordinate multiple private breeders, who have their own incentives, to save a species? Thirdly, look at tropical fish and, well, dogs. People breeding them tend to favour particular traits that lead to deformed fish that would never survive in the wild, or dogs that can't give birth naturally anymore. How do you ensure that the private breeders are breeding for genetic robustness, not a particular trait that's appealing to buyers? Lastly, and most importantly - what happens when you legalise ownership of endangered species, and captive breeding can't keep up with demand? If you guessed "poaching", you guessed right. Then there's also the fact that even if captive breeding could meet all market demand, the fact that now everyone in the lizard collecting community can have a jewelled gecko can drive certain collectors to want to own a "real" one, a wild one, to stand out from the people who have captive bred ones. This drive from aficionados to have the "authentic" product can be seen, for an example I can speak on, in venison exports from New Zealand to Germany. Germany loves venison, it's hard to come by in Europe, we can farm efficiently in NZ, and so we farm deer, butcher them, and export the meat to Germany. (NB: when I'm talking venison here, I'm referring to the meat of the red deer, Cervus elaphus. NZ has many other introduced species of deer, but reds are the most widespread and numerous, and also the one we have learned to farm the best, thanks to the market in Asia for deer velvet[0]). But a lot of German consumers want "real" venison, which means wild venison. So we market farmed venison as "cervena" to differentiate it from wild vension, and then use helicopters to harvest thousands of tonnes of wild venison from public land (called Wild Animal Recovery Operations, or WARO for short, actually a really great way of keeping deer numbers below ecosystem degrading numbers). The price premium it attracts makes the helicopter flight hours needed to harvest wild venison actually economical. [1], [2], and a perspective common of recreational hunters who despise WARO operations because no-one wants to walk into the mountains for two days, and then watch a helicopter shoot everything moving in the valley. [3] But the thing is, wild venison is always worse eating than farmed venison. It's far leaner (and venison is lean enough already, a larding needle is essential for cooking venison roasts[4]), tougher, it's gamier, it's just a poorer eating experience. Yet because German consumers consider it more "authentic", it attracts a premium. This is most likely what would happen to endangered species where you could buy a captive bred one, or a wild one. [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Velvet_antler https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Velvet_antler [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ptfr-LyXo8s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ptfr-LyXo8s [2]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKWvsS-z9PU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKWvsS-z9PU [3]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmvZ3y3RMXs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmvZ3y3RMXs [4]: https://www.meilleurduchef.com/en/recipe/to-lard-a-piece-of-meat.html https://www.meilleurduchef.com/en/recipe/to-lard-a-piece-of-...
- leobg 5y agoYou mean like an animal NFT?