3 ms·
This line stuck out for me: > I tried to ask for Dall-E by name but that was a content policy violation. It seems like they are trying to prevent it from visu
by amcaskill 4y ago
This line stuck out for me:
> I tried to ask for Dall-E by name but that was a content policy violation.
It seems like they are trying to prevent it from visualizing “itself”.
Is there a less exciting explanation?
- nighthawk454 4y agoless exciting: they put their brands in the blacklist they wouldn't want Dall-E's name plastered next to some harmful/offensive content. or generate uncontrolled PR from stupid meme articles. wouldn't be a bad idea to chuck all the companies names/brands in there. wouldn't be surprised if "OpenAI" and "GPT-3" are banned too. based on the comments, the policy violations cover a lot of territory - covid, explosive, nuclear war. one commenter said that "glass of guidelines" violates the policy, which is a nonsensical statement. suggesting either "guidelines" is a banned word. Or, maybe they have a content policy classifier, in which case a bunch of random stuff will probably trigger it. _for sure_ they're not worried the "AI might visualize itself", that's not really a thing
- amcaskill 4y agoRight right, PR risk, not AI safety risk. Of course, that makes way more sense.