4 ms·
Ok, so you're confirming that you're doing exactly what I said popular science articles often do.
by pwr-electronics 4y ago
Ok, so you're confirming that you're doing exactly what I said popular science articles often do.
- marginalia_nu 4y agoNo I am not. Breaking classical physics is not breaking physics.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- pwr-electronics 4y agoI'm running out of ways to explain myself, so I'll just reword and summarize this thread from my perspective: OC: Is it broken? Me: No, they make generous interpretations to claim that it's broken. You: With a generous interpretation, they can be said to break ... Like I said, we're not having the same conversation.
- marginalia_nu 4y agoThis is just sophistry. You're omitting the crucial context of what it is in these sentences, and it is only when this is done they appear contradictory.
- pwr-electronics 4y agoOf course there are contradictions. I'm talking about journalistic style in magazines. You're talking about something else.