3 ms·
> What makes the artists fake is that they are publishing only a couple songs for the specific purpose of providing the streaming platform with royalty free mus
by tyrfing 5y ago
> What makes the artists fake is that they are publishing only a couple songs for the specific purpose of providing the streaming platform with royalty free music
The article has 3 examples. Two have easily identified 3rd-party labels, the last is unclear. Neither is a traditional label, but there is also no indication they are owned by Spotify.
> People buy it expecting a curated playlist of music they want to hear, and instead what they get is a curated playlist of music that sounds similar to what they want to hear.
What bands would people expect in a playlist of background music? In fact, one is from a provider of royalty-free background music - which seems like exactly what you would expect in such a playlist. You could argue that it's not really jazz, which is understandable, but I'll file that gripe along with my anger that "New Metal Tracks" features lots of metalcore.
- aimor 5y agoI definitely had the wrong impression of how much music was produced by the examples given. It's not just "two songs and dissolve".
- Semaphor 5y ago> but I'll file that gripe along with my anger that "New Metal Tracks" features lots of metalcore. Metalcore is the top 100 music of metal, I doubt it’s going to change anytime soon. I’d guess what ever is not metalcore, is probably cheesy power metal like Sabaton or Gloryhammer.