4 ms·
Dunno, take say 1 gram of matter and convert it to energy. Then assume something 100x better than the JWST, add in a few more decades of signal processing, enc
by sliken 5y ago
Dunno, take say 1 gram of matter and convert it to energy. Then assume something 100x better than the JWST, add in a few more decades of signal processing, encoding, etc. Add in the possibility of receiving from more than a single solar system.
After all some random ham in 2005 set a record of 13M miles per watt. That's in 2005, with an standard radio (elecraft k1) and not any exotic receivers like say something 100-1000x better than the JWST that's I'd expect earth to have over the next few decades, let alone some other civilization that's sending sensors to likely millions of solar systems if they found us.
That's only 400kw for a light year, not that much assuming you are slinging sensors into other solar systems.
- teraflop 5y agoWell, the energy requirements for wireless communication go up with the distance squared. So even if you can transmit 13 million miles per watt, that's equivalent to about 200GW for 1 light year.
- sliken 5y agoAssuming omnidirectional transmissions, yes.
- Armisael16 5y agoIf you spread the energy out it will spread in a shape with area proportionate to the square of the distance. You can focus more of that power into a particular area, but the fundamentals here are not particularly negotiable.