2 ms·
Ebert was one of the last real effigies of good reviewing. The folks who took over after he died haven't really done his name justice. That said, I think "revi
by kodah 5y ago
Ebert was one of the last real effigies of good reviewing. The folks who took over after he died haven't really done his name justice.
That said, I think "reviewing" took on much more than what Roger Ebert stood for. I don't think he saw himself as a gatekeeper of quality as much as someone who could put the summary of the experience of watching a movie in text quite succinctly. Nowadays with things like rotten tomatoes, it literally is a rating, and it's definitional gatekeeping.
- KerrAvon 5y agoIf it's gatekeeping, it's not doing a very good job. Star Trek: First Contact had a 96% rotten tomatoes rating a few years ago. It's gradually dropped a bit since, but seems a bit high for that movie, compared with all other movies ever made.