3 ms·
Are you implying that definitions aren't real because they're not physical objects?
by Sohcahtoa82 5y ago
Are you implying that definitions aren't real because they're not physical objects?
- whatshisface 5y agoI'm implying that natural-language definitions are physical objects, in your brain, made up of brain stuff, and that you can't write them down in ways that are much briefer than a full description of their physical manifestation, although you can roughly approximate them in something like a dictionary.
- dpierce9 5y agoThen why bother writing these sentences? I have no idea what you mean by them.