3 ms·
> This is the original sentence you wrote: """ SuperCollider's license effectively stops you from designing commercial products. Even the free version of Elemen
by NateEag 5y ago
> This is the original sentence you wrote: """ SuperCollider's license effectively stops you from designing commercial products. Even the free version of Elementary allows that. """
I did not write that.
Here is my comment you responded to:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30998118 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30998118
You're thinking of Archit3ch's post here:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30995834 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30995834
Maybe you should check identities before levelling accusations at people.
- abetusk 5y agoYikes, my apologies. Some of what I said still stands but that's a big enough mistake on my part that I just need to apologize and back off.
- NateEag 5y agoI forgive you, and appreciate the apology and recognition that you needed to step away and take a breather. I do think you make a decent case for open source being a viable way to make a profitable business. There are certainly businesses that achieve that, and I would love to see more of them. I wasn't trying to give a blow-by-blow rebuttal to everything you wrote, so it's certainly fair to say I was cherrypicking. I was just trying to explain some of why I think making a business's core product open source ticks the difficulty level up a notch. I believe AWS has made a practice of snagging OSS systems and making them effectively their own, thus undercutting the original developers' attempts at running a business. I may be mistaken about that, though. As I said, though, you make a number of good points (most of which I already agree with). There are a number of ways to make it work, and I may well have overstated the difficulty of building businesses with GPL software.