> the main reason the democrats are antigun is that is where most of their funding comes from From a perspective of a country where gun controls are far strong

> the main reason the democrats are antigun is that is where most of their funding comes from From a perspective of a country where gun controls are far stronger, this idea that democrats are "antigun" seems hilariously partisan. Democrats only seem to be proposing modest gun controls compared to Republicans. What do you define as "most of their funding"? What percentage of Democrat funding comes from Soros or Bloomberg?