5 ms·
You'd think that, but data-driven economists were finding low correlations for this kind of (rational) thing specifically for the modern US dollar, which is con
by lmeyerov 5y ago
You'd think that, but data-driven economists were finding low correlations for this kind of (rational) thing specifically for the modern US dollar, which is confusing. Super great PlanetMoney/freakonomics episode on inflation ~last year. If I remember right, this broken state goes back to at least the Obama years, maybe closer to Clinton.
It's a weird state to be in. The rational thing becomes to continue (leverage) the weird situation -- the market expects continued regular high spend for whatever regular big thing of the month/year -- and the irresponsible thing becomes any deviations that risk rocking the boat (ex: risk EU style rallying on austerity becoming a self-fulling prophecy). A lot on inflation concern is triggering FUD loops (sporadic supply chain hits vs YoY spirals), so when we know the market treats USD differently to beginwith, accepting the FUD (by policies that assumes the USD is a weaker currency) is kind of the worst thing policy makers can do. Likewise, most non-US countries rely on USD stability, so probably same thing for their policy makers.
I'd hate to be the one making these calls.
- JacobThreeThree 5y ago>data-driven economists were finding low correlations for this kind of (rational) thing specifically for the US dollar Can you share these data-driven economist findings?
- lmeyerov 5y agoTried to find -- this was sometime 2020 / early 2021, and from a variety of sources (academic + gov), and pretty sure done by Freakonomics bc it was so weird. Interesting bc casts doubt on basically any expert wrt modern USD vs other currencies.
- lmeyerov 5y agoFun to see negative downvotes here. People dislike that the dollar breaks the rules :)