3 ms·
See my take-away from your first paragraph is quite different from your second paragraph. The point isn’t to argue about who’s counter-factual is right or wron
by zaroth 5y ago
See my take-away from your first paragraph is quite different from your second paragraph.
The point isn’t to argue about who’s counter-factual is right or wrong, it’s impossible to say.
At this point everyone has taken a position as to whether the “mitigations” were ethical, legal, effective, or not. There’s no point discussing it anymore unless or until people in power try to re-impose them.
- rory 5y agoI think it's clear avoiding the park, in retrospect, was unnecessary. I'm just describing the feeling at the time, which I believe was shared by the vast majority of people for at least those first few weeks. I could be wrong though.