3 ms·
I find that it depends on the size of the community, and your stake in that community. If you're a regular somewhere, you're a lot less likely to start some shi
by nicbou 5y ago
I find that it depends on the size of the community, and your stake in that community. If you're a regular somewhere, you're a lot less likely to start some shit there. After a while some users earn a reputation that affects all future interactions.
I treat my local subreddit like I would treat my local pub, especially since I know a few of its users IRL, and many tie my username to my business. I can't say the same about large subreddits.
Tight moderation also helps a ton. It enforces a certain tone, and after a while the community crystallises around that tone and enforces it itself. You don't pick fights at the country club.
I realise now that I stopped interacting in larger communities. I prefer quieter channels where people have a reputation to uphold.
- SamPatt 5y agoAgreed moderation is essential. It's easy to spot and remove people who don't care about harmony or true discussion, but it often doesn't happen (or moderators are themselves bad actors).
- nicbou 5y agoMy policy as a moderator was to moderate tone but not opinions. Some people weren't happy when "the good guys" got their posts deleted and "the bad guys" didn't, because the latter left their guns at the door. The new moderation team is more heavy-handed. Of course people still aren't happy. It's a tough job and the pay sucks.