4 ms·
I think the continuation of this line of thought is often the argument 'their bad faith communication is so effective we have to counter it with our own'. I hop
by rocqua 5y ago
I think the continuation of this line of thought is often the argument 'their bad faith communication is so effective we have to counter it with our own'.
I hope that this argument under-estimates the intelligence of the silent majority.
- ImPostingOnHN 5y agoThat is another good way to phrase the problem described by the parent post of yours. There is not a way to beat bad faith communication with good faith communication at scale, because the latter doesn't scale, because the average/median person is not intelligent enough for it. I wish they were.