5 ms·

Yeah, but... given there are other ACME providers, why would I choose one from the a company with googles reputation for sunsetting products?

• minerva23 5y ago
  As a Let’s Encrypt user and fan, I can answer this. LE is great, but their SLO is significantly below our customers’ expectations. For us, Google wouldn’t replace LE, it would supplement LE for higher reliability. Seeing more providers conforming to ACME at a price point of “free” is great for the ecosystem.
  • tehbeard 5y ago
    Is this with provisioning many new certs? The recommended renewal cycle gives you a 30 day lead on failure becoming a problem, plenty of time for multiple retries or recovery processes to use an alternate. The only issues I've ran into, have stemmed from DNS for wildcard certs, where a client's DNS provider is... pretty crap about updating records despite low ttls being set.
    • michaelt 5y ago
      Some people on the cloud like to issue a certificate per machine, so no ACME = no new VMs.
    • minerva23 5y ago
      It’s a web hosting business. New customers want effortless free TLS asap. We get customers who routinely create new sites who come to expect fast provisioning.
• jwandborg 5y ago
  Does Google Cloud also have that reputation? I've seen renames and well-motivated deprecations, but not the Google Graveyard kind of events.
  • danielheath 5y ago
    "This API you use has changed, you have 6 months to update your code" is not unheard of. On AWS, the equivalent is "We no longer recommend this, and it's not visible in the AWS console unless you are already using it or have asked support to enable it, but it will keep working indefinitely".