3 ms·
My understanding is this bill is more focused on sexual orientation and gender than it is sex ed. Both of which are topics we’ve evolved on as a culture over th
by jjj123 5y ago
My understanding is this bill is more focused on sexual orientation and gender than it is sex ed. Both of which are topics we’ve evolved on as a culture over the last 20 years.
I don’t think kindergartners need sex ed, but I do think explaining that some kids have two moms or two dads is worthwhile at that age.
- raxxorraxor 5y ago> Both of which are topics we’ve evolved on as a culture over the last 20 years. I think you propose agreement on issues where there is none which was partly the motivation of this bill.
- hayd 5y ago> some kids have two moms or two dads I 100% agree that's reasonable. What's unreasonable is schools/teachers practicing "gender affirmation" of 5 year olds (or indeed any age) behind parents' backs. If a boy likes playing princess it doesn't mean he's a girl, and to be honest that seems patronising and cruel.