6 ms·
There is nothing in this bill that prevents a school psychologist or guidance counselor from working with individual children to address their personal needs. T
by lr4444lr 5y ago
There is nothing in this bill that prevents a school psychologist or guidance counselor from working with individual children to address their personal needs. The bill's text is hardly remarkable at all. 20 years ago, no one would have batted an eye if you said that sex ed should not be taught below a certain grade level.
- jjj123 5y agoMy understanding is this bill is more focused on sexual orientation and gender than it is sex ed. Both of which are topics we’ve evolved on as a culture over the last 20 years. I don’t think kindergartners need sex ed, but I do think explaining that some kids have two moms or two dads is worthwhile at that age.
- raxxorraxor 5y ago> Both of which are topics we’ve evolved on as a culture over the last 20 years. I think you propose agreement on issues where there is none which was partly the motivation of this bill.
- hayd 5y ago> some kids have two moms or two dads I 100% agree that's reasonable. What's unreasonable is schools/teachers practicing "gender affirmation" of 5 year olds (or indeed any age) behind parents' backs. If a boy likes playing princess it doesn't mean he's a girl, and to be honest that seems patronising and cruel.