3 ms·
Here's an even easier set of requirement to simplify the first case: - Require all research to publish their source code. - Require all research to publish th
by epgui 5y ago
Here's an even easier set of requirement to simplify the first case:
- Require all research to publish their source code.
- Require all research to publish their raw data minus "PII".
* Note: I use "PII" here with the intention of it taking the most liberal meaning possible, where privacy trumps transparency absolutely and where de-anonymization is impossible. This would rule out a lot of data, and personally I think we could take a more balanced approach, but even this minimalist approach would be a vast improvement on the current situation.
- bjelkeman-again 5y agoWhen I learned at university that not all published research, especially government funded, didn’t do this already I was dumbfounded.
- epgui 5y ago"Not all" is a big understatement... I would estimate that less than 0.00001% of published research does this. Every time I talk about this to someone (colleagues in adjacent fields, PIs...), they seem to give zero pucks. It's really mind-boggling.