>At the end of the day, the free-speechers really just want to be able to use racist slurs If you are unaware of Ellen Pao and her challenges as a leader. Do g

>At the end of the day, the free-speechers really just want to be able to use racist slurs If you are unaware of Ellen Pao and her challenges as a leader. Do go look it up. This tweet isn't about free speech absolutism or the limited exceptions. What's more important to understand is the rules she is breaking as a leader and it's clear as day here. You can actually learn a ton from this tweet when you realize it has nothing to do with free speech or racism. A good leader, someone who lives by the rules, https://fs.blog/how-to-win-friends-and-influence-people/ https://fs.blog/how-to-win-friends-and-influence-people/ though I certainly recommend reading the book. How many rules is she breaking? She is criticizing, condemning, and complaining. She's not honest displaying this strawman argument, literally nobody actually thinks free speech is about racism. She's not arousing good discussion. She's not genuinely interested in the debate of free speech given nobody can comment. No chance of her listening to these 'racist free speechers' How would this have played out differently if she included the picture. Then just asked what people think and allowed everyone to comment? Made an argument for her position that abusive behaviours like this should be an exception to free speech. That in the limited extent of 100% abuse, 0% value posts censorship works. The elimination or censorship over these would be of no loss and I would agree. It's that 1%, 2%, 3%.