3 ms·
It's the PR risk. You can easily pass the 'look good to an uniformed observer' test with human faces. Remember, faces were something GANs were doing near-flawl
by gwern 5y ago
It's the PR risk.
You can easily pass the 'look good to an uniformed observer' test with human faces. Remember, faces were something GANs were doing near-flawlessly back as far as ProGAN all the way back in the dark ages of late 2017. (Then StyleGAN did non-photograph faces, like anime - see my ThisWaifuDoesNotExist for a demo of that.) Doing them as part of a larger composition, where the face is a small part of the images and may vary much more than in closeup centered portraits, is harder, but take a look at how Facebook's DALL-E rival Make-A-Scene does it: https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.13131#facebook https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.13131#facebook They specially target faces as part of the training process, with face-specific detectors/losses, and so the faces come out great.
- BlueTemplar 5y agoFair enough, but it could be... both ! Since you know that training for photo-realistic faces is going to take extra effort, and that you're not going to allow them - you could just spare that effort ! (Or maybe leave it for later, if the network is flexible enough ?)