3 ms·
People are more forgiving torwards themselves and their own folks, I can understand that. I'm just thinking it's important to make decisions based on facts. Som
by media-trivial 4y ago
People are more forgiving torwards themselves and their own folks, I can understand that. I'm just thinking it's important to make decisions based on facts. Some self-hosters walk around with this "my own basement is safer than Amazon datacenters" attitude and that's just not true (in most cases, I guess :D).
- fisf 4y agoNo. The basic assumption is only, that if I pay somebody money for the service and to keep things running, then sudden data loss is unacceptable (and a multi week downtime even more so). Some companies cannot operate effectively without atlassian products, so a fuckup of that scale might just have legal consequences depending on whom it hits.
- vntok 4y ago> Some companies cannot operate effectively without atlassian products Kind of their problem to be frank. > so a fuckup of that scale might just have legal consequences depending on whom it hits. Any contract those companies signed would have a cap on the retributions by Atlassian for trashing SLA targets
- akho 4y agoIn my years of selfhosting personal stuff I never had a service “sunset“, never lost data, and never had significant downtime. In the external services I use, downtime of one service or other is to be expected at least a few times a year, and the “sunsets” happen occasionally. Thing is, public services are solving a much more difficult problem (keeping things running safely for millions).