And the "security review" that will be completed "before summer" has already yielded results, and the results are 100% in favor of one possible outcome? I read

And the "security review" that will be completed "before summer" has already yielded results, and the results are 100% in favor of one possible outcome? I read an article a few months back about a Swedish town that prepares itself as a place for storing nuclear waste for the next 10000 years. The one thing I remember from that article is that it took 18 years to start building the facility. I get that desperate times and so on, but I think deciding something huge on a timeline this tight is not very probable. EDIT: actually, storage meant for 100_000 years! Here: https://www.dw.com/en/sweden-approves-plans-for-forsmark-nuclear-waste-storage-site/a-60584787 https://www.dw.com/en/sweden-approves-plans-for-forsmark-nuc...