3 ms·
And non-quantitive evaluations are prone to favoritism and prejudice. AKA people gaming the system. I doubt there's an easy answer. Trying to better align the
by _tom_ 5y ago
And non-quantitive evaluations are prone to favoritism and prejudice. AKA people gaming the system.
I doubt there's an easy answer.
Trying to better align the short term objectives with longer term ones could help, but that just makes it harder to game, doesn't eliminate it.
- j7ake 5y agoIt’s why one needs both. You need both undeniable productivity by quantitative metrics, as well as glowing reviews from independent panels that are not influenced by favoritism (almost like an audit).