If you are trying to explain to a jury that your client was in danger and needed to defend himself against people, mentioning that the people had committed sexu

If you are trying to explain to a jury that your client was in danger and needed to defend himself against people, mentioning that the people had committed sexual assault and domestic violence would help with your case that they needed to be defended against and weren't "peaceful protesters" but, actually proven violent criminals that corroborate their violence against your client. The fact he shot three people and all of which happened to be 1. A person released from prison recently for disorderly conduct and a domestic abuse charge 2. An arsonist and convicted child molester 3. Convicted felon affiliated with the "Peoples Revolution" group best known for attacking a police officer, and pointing a loaded gun at your client. These facts demonstrate without even showing the video footage, that all 3 had the capacity for violence and are the type of people that you may find yourself having to defend yourself against (as other have had to in the past)