4 ms·
Quarkus had a really annoying static only DB layer which turned me off. Spring Data was way better with the interfaces. I don't know if Quarkus changes recent
by krzyk 5y ago
Quarkus had a really annoying static only DB layer which turned me off.
Spring Data was way better with the interfaces.
I don't know if Quarkus changes recently (well, in 2-3 years) in that regard.
And 3 years ago it didn't support newer JDK versions, it supported up to JDK 11 AFAIR, while there was already JDK 13 or something like that. It was a bummer for a framework that advertised as hipster-new. AFAIK they migrated out of jboss library that was holding them back in newer JDK support but I was burned twice already and didn't want to give another try.
- jxi 5y agoIt has to be static or AOT compatible to compile to native with Graal.
- invalidname 5y agoI really like a lot of the ideas in Quarkus. They also pushed for Spring Native which is an interesting new direction. But to me one of the biggest values is sheer traction. Spring controls the market completely. You have so many engineers with deep real world experience with Spring. So many books, blogs etc. When you run into a problem there's someone. When you need to hire, it's easy. That's a huge benefit.