4 ms·
> Humans can do some cool things when we decide to. And scaling solar isn't as easy as it sounds. Weirdly enough, we're already currently annually installing s
by jhgb 5y ago
> Humans can do some cool things when we decide to. And scaling solar isn't as easy as it sounds.
Weirdly enough, we're already currently annually installing so much solar power (in terms of actual energy output, not just nameplate) that it equates the progress accomplished in the nuclear industry in the past fifteen years or so. In other words, the nuclear industry would have to accelerate by more than an order to magnitude just to catch up with today's solar power growth. But of course solar power growth itself increases by around 30% every year on average... To me that almost sounds like it's scaling nuclear power that isn't as easy as it sounds.
> but also the massive batteries required for solar
Yeah, there's no such thing as "massive batteries required for solar" in a proper high-renewable grid. Simulations show (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2018.07.004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2018.07.004) that in a cost-optimal grid mix, pumped hydro is economically preferred over batteries.
- orthecreedence 5y ago> pumped hydro is economically preferred over batteries. Which is a massive battery.
- jhgb 5y agoIf by "battery", you mean "a primary or secondary electrochemical cell or cells", as is its usual meaning, then it's not.