? The FBI have information about the people they are nabbing and already have a risk profile. If the people the are grabbing have zero history of violence, no

? The FBI have information about the people they are nabbing and already have a risk profile. If the people the are grabbing have zero history of violence, no gun ownership, no gang association, there's no reason to smash down the door. Even judging by neighbourhood: It's probably unfair but my bet is diplomats don't generally get into shootouts with the cops. They could probably safely do the same in middle class neighbourhoods as well. It's not a nice statement about equity, rather my belief that the 'risk' to police is probably entirely from specific kinds of problem areas which are probably poor. If you look at a map of violent crime in cities, the delineations are pretty clear. Some neighbourhoods have almost zero violent crime, two blocks down, it's Caracas. 'Zip Code' profiling might actually be just, but I don't see why they could not do it on a case to case basis.