and not evasive the way this piece is It's a piece about identifying 'PR hits' that misidentified something as a 'PR hit'. There's a microscopic 'correction' a

and not evasive the way this piece is It's a piece about identifying 'PR hits' that misidentified something as a 'PR hit'. There's a microscopic 'correction' at the bottom but the fact the correction undermines the premise of the piece - that you too can learn to identify 'PR hits' from Paul Graham - is just ignored.