Just for the record, I did the bicycle/Caltrain commute for years -- with my bike for one job, using city bikes in SF at another. It's doable, even preferable i

Just for the record, I did the bicycle/Caltrain commute for years -- with my bike for one job, using city bikes in SF at another. It's doable, even preferable in some scenarios. I'm all for making cities as bikeable as possible. Now I'm older, with kids, and have a health scenario that precludes biking (Getting a trike soon to be able to cycle at all). This area is probably one of the most bike-friendly in the US. But still, are you going to bike a week's shopping for a family of five? Costco? Ikea? Dressed up for dinner? Visiting grandparents 10 miles away? I tried to buck the trend. A full year here with just 1 family car. On good days, it sort of worked, but eventually we had to break down and get a 2nd car. Between rushing to get kids to school, working long hours at a startup, even walking the dog in a nice field so she could run -- we just had too many hiccups with a single car. That is just how CA was conceived and built. I think it would be more productive to accept that there is a demand for the suburban lifestyle, and come up with creative solutions that fit that demand, but also address issues of housing and climate. You could make the analogy to architecture. It doesn't work to look at a city and say "This is all wrong", then build whatever suits your aesthetic. You try to modernize but also blend in. Work with the structure you are given. It never works to say "This sucks, burn it down and start from scratch".