> For example, when someone calls a statement "x-ist," they're also implicitly saying that this is the end of the discussion. What a load of shit. So he sets u

> For example, when someone calls a statement "x-ist," they're also implicitly saying that this is the end of the discussion. What a load of shit. So he sets up this opinion piece with a poorly constructed straw man (quite literally a false statement in every _discussion_ I've been part of) then uses this as an anchor for the rest? I mean, this is one of the most aggressively conventional takes on cancel culture I've read over the past year. Maybe he should get back to being active with YC again so he has less time to embarrass himself like this.