4 ms·
...What? The comment you're replying to is pretty explicitly arguing the exact opposite of what you claim it is. "People will be ok with this restriction becau
by tbrownaw 5y ago
...What? The comment you're replying to is pretty explicitly arguing the exact opposite of what you claim it is.
"People will be ok with this restriction because it's similar to this earlier clearly correct restriction."
- otterley 5y ago<redacted>
- tbrownaw 5y ago...what? The second paragraph is saying that the practices that the FHA banned were also illiberalism, just like the current practices of the current service providers. And there is no charitable interpretation or benefit of the doubt needed; it's crystal clear. In order to even have the option of reading it the way you keep trying to, I'd have to ignore: referring to the landlords who had their bad behavior banned as "bigots"; putting scare quotes around both cases of "wrong"; explicitly calling the current platform providers illiberal.
- otterley 5y agoI apologize to the author; upon reflection, I think your interpretation is correct.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]