4 ms·

the germane point is we've tried just about every kind of land, at this point, and none of them play out. could it work in 50 years? maybe. probably not. it

the germane point is we've tried just about every kind of land, at this point, and none of them play out. could it work in 50 years? maybe. probably not. it's not working in 7 years, which is the climate change timeline. it's time to stop trying to chase new inventions, and just build 1970s nuclear.

ncmncm 5y ago
Or abandon failed ideas like nukes, and build out what has proven overwhelmingly better on every axis. A very respectable amount of utility power is generated geothermally, and has been for decades without mishap. What is new here is a drilling method. Power extraction from a hot borehole is mature tech.
- JohnHaugeland 5y ago
  > Or abandon failed ideas like nukes which produce 778 billion kwh in the united states . > A very respectable amount of utility power is generated geothermally 16 billion kwh . > and has been for decades without mishap. More deaths have occurred from geothermal, total, than nuclear, despite that nuclear delivers 48x the power. Guatemala City: 33. Dieng: 41. Fenton Hill: 12. Sorik Marapi: 5. Soultz-sous-Foretz: 19. Calpine: three times. 1, 5, 4. El Salvador: 12. Sumatera: 6. Leyte: two incidents: 5, 17. Sarulla: 18. Brisbane: 14. Reykavik: 2. It'll get worse. AltaRock had to be stopped twice for causing earthquakes. Strasbourg was permanently stopped. So was dover. Pohang's earthquakes put a city under lockdown and killed two people. There exists no decade since the launch of geothermal power where at least 25 people didn't die. Nuclear has only had that count once.
  - ncmncm 5y ago
    I am sure you have also totted up all the accidents that occurred mining, refining, or transporting uranium. And, everybody poisoned by runoff from mine tailings leaching into their water supply. (Some American Indian tribes, for example, have lawsuits on over that.) And, deaths in construction accidents during plant construction, and in transporting the thousands of tons of concrete and steel. And, mining the limestone, manufacturing the concrete, and mining and making the steel. Oh, you haven't? My mistake.

ncmncm 5y ago

Or abandon failed ideas like nukes, and build out what has proven overwhelmingly better on every axis. A very respectable amount of utility power is generated geothermally, and has been for decades without mishap. What is new here is a drilling method. Power extraction from a hot borehole is mature tech.

JohnHaugeland 5y ago
> Or abandon failed ideas like nukes which produce 778 billion kwh in the united states . > A very respectable amount of utility power is generated geothermally 16 billion kwh . > and has been for decades without mishap. More deaths have occurred from geothermal, total, than nuclear, despite that nuclear delivers 48x the power. Guatemala City: 33. Dieng: 41. Fenton Hill: 12. Sorik Marapi: 5. Soultz-sous-Foretz: 19. Calpine: three times. 1, 5, 4. El Salvador: 12. Sumatera: 6. Leyte: two incidents: 5, 17. Sarulla: 18. Brisbane: 14. Reykavik: 2. It'll get worse. AltaRock had to be stopped twice for causing earthquakes. Strasbourg was permanently stopped. So was dover. Pohang's earthquakes put a city under lockdown and killed two people. There exists no decade since the launch of geothermal power where at least 25 people didn't die. Nuclear has only had that count once.
- ncmncm 5y ago
  I am sure you have also totted up all the accidents that occurred mining, refining, or transporting uranium. And, everybody poisoned by runoff from mine tailings leaching into their water supply. (Some American Indian tribes, for example, have lawsuits on over that.) And, deaths in construction accidents during plant construction, and in transporting the thousands of tons of concrete and steel. And, mining the limestone, manufacturing the concrete, and mining and making the steel. Oh, you haven't? My mistake.