2 ms·

I guess the original article didn't take misleading statements into account. Because your statement might indeed be factually true, but very misleading. What a

I guess the original article didn't take misleading statements into account. Because your statement might indeed be factually true, but very misleading. What about "Can a statement be x-ist, for whatever value of x, and also true, when the statement is clear in its intentions and not misleading?". Would you agree with that?

happytoexplain 5y ago
An excellent point - see my reply to the parent about "13/52" for my personal opinion. Edit: Note that my post implies that racial hatred/propaganda is a subset of racism, which you may or may not agree with semantically.