3 ms·
> Both can be understood as interventions And both are wrong. > but they are not equivalent And still, both are wrong.
by maratc 5y ago
> Both can be understood as interventions
And both are wrong.
> but they are not equivalent
And still, both are wrong.
- csee 5y agoTechnically true, but this reeks of false balance fallacy. The US recognizing that Yatsenyuk will inevitably take power (given that he was the most popular opposition politician by far) and strategizing about factional politics following a brewing revolution is just categorically different to annexing territory and poisoning opponent politicians.
- Isinlor 5y agoRead my comments above in this discussion tree. > I agree that discussing who should and should not be in the government of an independent state is wrong. But annexing a piece of land is just on a completely different level. There is no equivalency and you should not be trying to create it.
- maratc 5y ago> There is no equivalency There's also no equivalency between a serial killer who killed 10 people and a serial killer who killed 100 people. > and you should not be trying to create it I'm not trying to create any equivalency. But if these two serial killers are fighting each other to death, may I please be excused from rooting for one of them?