3 ms·
I don't think the standard was vague... It just didn't describe how to transfer a double word. So instead of the standard being vague, I see it as the drives vi
by RedShift1 5y ago
I don't think the standard was vague... It just didn't describe how to transfer a double word. So instead of the standard being vague, I see it as the drives violating the at that time current ATA spec.
- Kwpolska 5y ago> I see it as the drives violating the at that time current ATA spec. How are they violating the spec if > It just didn't describe how to transfer a double word. The standard was vague, because it specified (a) there is a double-word value, and (b) communication goes over a single-word data bus, but not (c) how to transfer the double-word value over the single-word data bus, leading to drive manufacturers pick the way they liked the most.